Blogged with Flock
Friday, December 28, 2007
School Days: Holy CRAP!
It starts out boring. Mokoto has a crush on Katsura. His best lady friend Sekai (who sits next to him in class) helps him win the heart of lady fair. Except - Sekai is also in love with Mokoto. Oh, no! Not the dreaded anime love triangle!
But then - things get odd. Mokoto finds that being a boyfriend to Katsura is harder than he thought, compared to being friends with Sekai. But - Katsura isn't quite ready to give up on her boyfriend when things go south. And there are other girls with crushes on Mokoto. Insert plenty of fan service, and you're certain that this is yet another typical "cute girls with big boobs and short skirts anime", right until -
Holy. Fucking. Shit. The ending comes at you from left field so hard, you do *not* see it coming. Turns out the anime is based on an ero-game from Japan (basically, "Pick the right path a la 'Choose your own adventure' style, get hot nekked sex with the right girl), and the story fits that with so many girls crushing hard on one guy.
Unlike your generic harem comedy or even drama, things go very dark, in a very hard way. There are real world consequences for toying with a girls heart - or recklessly engaging her body in ways that most 15 year olds aren't ready for emotionally. The end result has literally left me thinking I am going to have some *very* scary dreams tonight.
I'm not sure if I can recommend this, but - damn. Perhaps I should, because if art is the ability to move a person's emotions, then this anime series succeeds incredibly well.
Blogged with Flock
Monday, December 24, 2007
Defending Bedford Falls
If you recall from "It's a Wonderful Life", George Bailey gets to see the world if he had never been born. People dead because he wasn't there. Entire communities gone. A town turned into the personal playground of a rich land baron. We get to see how Bedford Falls would have become Pottersville, a place full of drink, dancing, gambling, and all manner of entertainment.
In his article, Mr. Kamiya defends Pottersville. Compared to Bedford Falls, it's a happening place. Who wouldn't want to live in Pottersville? Bedford Falls just has people walking about, maybe strolling through the grass. There's one loose woman of morals, while Pottersville has scores of ladies ready to do whatever you want, whenever you want.
Mr. Kamiya wrote an article so strong, that for years, I've been troubled by it. I'm certain he wrote it as a sarcastic commentary upon the movie and our society. But - there was a kernel of truth to what he said. Pottersville *is* a fun place. Why wouldn't the people of Bedford Falls want to live there?
And then, after years of pondering this issue, I understood the flaw in Mr. Kamiya's defense of Pottersville:
It's a sham.
You see, the people of Bedford Falls *could* have everything that Pottersville have. They have no shortage of people who could make money. After all, didn't Martini make his bar off of a loan from George Bailey? There's a pharmacist in town who I'm certain could sell any number of pleasure enhancing drugs to the people in town.
The difference is that in Pottersvillle, there is no choice. Potter has decided that the town will be a sopping den of liquer and iniquity. In Bedford Falls, the people *could* have made the town whatever they wanted, and George Bailey would have supported them just the same. They could have gone ahead and turned it into another version of Vegas had they chosen, and Potter wouldn't have been able to profit a dime off of it with George Bailey there.
That is the issue with Pottersville. It isn't that Bedford Falls is a dull, boring place. It's that the people have the choice in their own destiny, and they choose a simple, peaceful life. In Pottersville, their lives become nothing but a living hell because the only choice is serving Potter, becoming another cog in his machine to fill his pockets even further off of their sweat and misery.
Blogged with Flock
I just seem to attract them
There I was sitting in one of the restaurants before another Christmas show was suppose to start, and this kid sitting at another table looks at me. "Hey, that's a stupid hat," he says.
I look at him. He was wearing a "My Chemical Romance" shirt and an attitude. "Bite me, you little punk."
He stands up, all 100 pounds of him. "Bite me?" he says. "Bite me?" he approaches, then sticks out his hand and grins. "Hey, cool. Nice to meet you. I'm Jeff."
"I'm John. Nice shirt."
I shook his hand. He then sat down and told me all about My Chemical Romance, how much he liked Insane Clown Posse more, about his favorite video (it's on Youtube - that's youtube.com, you know), and on and on.
I chatted with him, asked about his family ("not here, which is cool because I can ride all the rides I want and not hear them blah, blah, blah at me"), how he was doing, so on and so forth.
We talked for a bit, then I excused myself to get my own lunch. By the time he had come back, he was gone.
I wish I knew what had happened to him. I hope he's going to have a Merry Christmas.
Blogged with Flock
Thursday, December 20, 2007
Too many accounts
I don't know what they're there for. I hardly use them.
Blogged with Flock
I have idiots for siblings
So I ask for it.
I get a Facebook message from my sister. "Why are you asking for my email address. Don't you have it?"
This may be the dumbest question I have ever been asked. If I had it, would I be asking for it? It's 5 days until Christmas. Why the hell would I be asking for an email address?
And why would you send me a Facebook message *instead of just emailing me*? Do my sisters think I'm going to sign them up for tentacle nostril rape porn spam or something?
People wonder why I only visit my family once a year. This is why.
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Thursday, December 13, 2007
Banking annoyance
Yesterday, I went to pay my tuition for the last 16 credit hours of classes I need to finish before getting my Bachelor's Degree in Computer Science. Total: $3800 ($250 per credit hour, minus 5% for paying it all at once.) I had saved up $4000, so this wasn't a problem.
(Though I really wanted a laptop. But school is more important.)
I put in my bank credit card detail, the one that's tied right to my checking account. I don't use regular credit cards any more - if I don't have the money, I just deal without it.
Today, I get an email telling me that the bank couldn't authorize the payment. I call them up. "What up? I got $4K in the bank, and you won't authorize it?"
"You're only allowed $3k a day off of your bank card. Make the school split the payments."
The problem: they don't authorize based on what's actually in my bank account. Last week, someone tried to buy a $600 laptop off of my wife's credit card. Luckily, because we're anal, we check our bank account every damn day, so we stopped that in a hurry. But still - in the account we had $100 in checking. The bank should have said "Hey, there's no money in this account.
Instead, they approved it, then proceeded to charge us overdraft transfer fees and the like. What they *should* have done is deny the charge because there was no money in the bank.
Then, in my situation, there was clearly money in the bank, but they don't base the bank card charge approvals off of the money that you actually have. Does this make any sense to anyone?
I finally wound up using my corporate AMEX card, which means I'll put the $3800 into my high interest savings account for a few weeks, then transfer it out to pay the AMEX bill when it comes due on January 02. If nothing else, maybe I'll earn $10 in interest.
Still, the whole thing just bugs me. Bank cards are there to use like a check book. You swipe the card, the bank should go "You have X money in the account", and use that money. Period. That's it. Obviously, though, they don't.
And now we wonder one of the reasons why banks are starting to have issues because of the credit industry.
Monday, December 10, 2007
Rape in Iraq - I thought it couldn't get worse
She finally got to a phone from one of the guards, called her father, who called his congressman, who got the state department involved. When they got her out of the container, Army doctors verified she had been raped multiple times.
Here's the part that kills me:
Jones told ABCNews.com that an examination by Army doctors showed she had been raped "both vaginally and anally," but that the rape kit disappeared after it was handed over to KBR security officers.
WHY IN GOD'S HOLY NAME DID THEY HAND OVER THE RAPE KIT TO KBR SECURITY OFFICERS? What the hell is going on here?
And evidently, they're going to get away with it. Why? Because there's a "get out of jail free" card for all contractors in Iraq, so nobody from the US government is even bothering to investigate it. Even worse, now that she's filed a civil suit, Halliburton says:
1. Well, we've "divested" ourselves of KBR, so we're not responsible. (I have the feeling everything bad that Halliburton/KBR has done in Iraq will be blaimed on KBR so the parent company isn't hurt).
2. Because she was an employee, we get to hire an arbiter for the case, so she can't go to trial.
The story speaks for itself. I don't know what to do with my outrage. I really don't.
Source: ABC News
Sunday, December 09, 2007
Mitt Romney is Wrong: Religion requires freedom
First of all, I'm Mormon. Which means that I'm about to be followed by a bunch of comments regarding holy underwear and wives and plates and whatever. To which I'll only say: whatever. Just as weird as believing that a piece of cracker turns to blood in your mouth, or that you get 70 virgins if you die defending your faith. Yes, we had a problem with racism up until the 1970's, and the whole polygamy thing is good for a laugh. Every religion "grows up", and mine is pretty young that suffered some trauma early on.
Second: Mr. Romney was wrong when he said "Freedom requires religion". He's wrong logically, he's especially wrong when it comes to the tenants of the Mormon faith. What he did was throw out a bone to the religious right who want to see separation of church and state brought down. Yet when you ask any Mormon (or at least, any one that I've talked to down here in Florida), they think that's a terrible, terrible idea.
Why is Mr. Romney wrong based on Mormon faith? Mormons like myself believe that God inspired the US Constitution. He didn't write it, but he inspired the people behind it. Why? Again, by Mormon belief, so that there would be a nation conceived in liberty that would allow religious freedom to allow the conditions of the restoration of the church.
Think about that a second: Mr. Romney said "Freedom requires religion". But right away, according to Mormon faith, he runs into a major problem: the history of the church believes that the Constitution was created with freedom of religion, in order to allow free expression of religion to occur.
Therefore, one could only conclude by the Mormon faith that it is not that "Freedom requires religion", but "Religion requires freedom"! Without free expression of religious beliefs, you can not have complete expression of any religion.
Then, look at other countries. Do they have religion in China? Sure. Do they have free expression of it? No. Therefore, people having religious beliefs haven't magically made China a flourishing democracy.
Mormons believe strongly in the separation of church and state. The 11th article of faith reads "We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may."
I might have added "Or not, as they may", but hey, it was the 1800's, atheists were a crazy idea to some people. Then again, so was the idea finding plates that said that Jesus visited America, so forgive him. Mormons know what happens without complete separation of church and state - you get a situation where your religion gets murdered just because you have crazy ideas that Jesus was the son of God (literally) or something, and then you run to Utah.
Trust me - the vast majority of Mormons that I've talked to strongly believe in the separation of church and state.
I haven't met a single Mormon in my area that wants to vote for Mr. Romney. I don't want to vote for him. I would have supported him if he kept his "beliefs" that gay marriage was fine, and his pro-choice statements (yes, there are Mormons like myself who are pro-gay marriage and pro-choice because of my beliefs in constitutional freedoms, which are separate from my religious beliefs). By dropping them once he ran for president, he's only proven to me he's a guy who will say anything to get elected, so I don't know *what* he believes, save in power.
So, Mr. Romney is wrong - Freedom does *not* require Religion. Free expression of Religion requires Freedom of expression, separation of church and state to ensure that no other religion can enforce its beliefs on others. To say otherwise only proves that not only is he a bad candidate, but also a badly thinking Mormon.
Of course, this is all just my opinion. I could be wrong.
Reply to this comment
Thursday, December 06, 2007
We didn't hide anything. Really.
In 2005, they deleted the tapes. Evidently, they thought nobody would need them. Not Congress who was investigating whether the CIA was using torture techniques (such as waterboarding). Not the justice department. Not the courts who would want to know just how the evidence against the suspects was obtained.
Yeah. I'm *sure* there was nothing to hide here.
Great gaming article
Destructoid - a site I usually avoid, to be honest, has a great article written by Jim Sterling, on how maybe the Xbox Live incidents aren't a problem with "frat boys", but people in general - and it's up to use to fix it.
Wednesday, December 05, 2007
Charlie Gibson interviews President Bush
The scariest bits:
But [President Musharraf] says he believes in democracy but this state of emergency, which he says he needs to do to fight terrorism, all he's done is arrest political opponents, he's arrested lawyers, he's arrested human rights people. It looks more about saving his own political skin?
PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH: Well, as I say, he has done more for Democracy in Pakistan than, than any modern leader has...
He hasn't crossed any line, and he has done for democracy than any other modern leader? WTF? Arresting his political opponents, firing supreme court memebers who would vote against him to get the results he wants, banning lawyers, keeping his other opponents under house arrest - *please* tell me how this is good for a democracy.
I used to think that Mr. Bush was ignorant, taken advantage of. But when you say "Well, you have to suspend democracy, put yourself in power in a coup, keep your opponents from running against you - well, you *need* that from time to time for a healthy working democracy" - at that moment, you're not stupid.
You're evil.
HARLES GIBSON: Just one more question on Pakistan, are the, are the nuclear weapons, in your mind, safe from Islamic radicals, and can you be sure?
PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH: I certainly hope so.
Oh, that's comforting.
Tuesday, December 04, 2007
My daughter is playing
I'm so happy.
Deaf man tasered. In his bathtub. In the wrong house
The only thing I can figure is they were terrified of getting wang smacked or something, because somehow, I don't think he was going to pull an Uzi from between his butt cheeks.
Appeals court says "No" to Faith Based Prisons
Religious group tells the inmates if they convert to their religion, that they're saved - otherwise, they're damned.
Inmates start noticing if you join their religion, you get to parole boards faster and other perks.
Luckily, the US Federal Appeals Court unanimously shot it down.
Thank goodness.
Source: Crooks and Liars
Presidential Hopefuls who have lost my vote
Ron Paul: For wanting to dismantle pretty much every government agency (Education Department, EPA, etc) since "the market will take care of it", even though every historical indicator indicates that no, it won't. (I guess that's why I support Kucinich more than Paul - each share equal constitutional appeal, but have opposed economic ideals).
Mitt Romney: For being Janus on every issue before he became a Republican. And for wanting to continue the torture at Guantanamo.
Huckabee: For wanting to dismantle the Department of Education (really - what is it with a department that ensures that educational standards are met and financed across the country so you don't have "rich" states outstrip the "poor" states in spending, therefore creating a power shift to richer states? Don't they get this would make "blue" states the more dominant after 20 years?)
McCain: For walking around, with 200 armed soldiers, with a helmet on - and telling people things in Iraq are getting better.
Guiliani: For being like Romney on torture and Iran and everything else - only worse.
From the Democratic side:
Hilary Clinton: For attacking Obama for what he said as a kindergarten student. Yes, I'm serious. Oh, and for what he said in the 3rd fracking grade as well.
Monday, December 03, 2007
My Word Coach Review
If only it wasn't so stupid about it.
Here's the idea: a vocabulary/spelling game that has multiplayer. Every day, you play by "writing" the missing letters, or selecting which word matches a certain definition. Over time, you unlock more games, and learn more words to increase your vocabulary.
This is a great idea. I was into this concept for all of - 15 minutes.
And then I was done playing.
PROBLEM #1: The interface is the worst of those who would accuse the Wii of being purely waggle. In order to select your options, you tilt the Wiimote right or left. Even worst, tilting the Wiimote right moves the options/letters left, and vice versa. So I think "OK, I want to select this item", I tilt the remote - and I'm punished because the game says "No, no - you must tilt *left* to go *right*".
But - why the hell can't I point at the option? I know the developers can use the Wiimote as a pointer, because that's how you play all of the multiplayer games. So why not do the same thing in the single player games and in selecting options? Point - and click.
Say it with me. "Point, and click."
So, major loser points for a stupid interface that is not fun.
PROBLEM #2: Like Brain Age, you set up a profile. One of the fun things about Brian Age is seeing at a glance how you compare to the other players. I put myself on, My Lovely Wife put in hers, and then my daughter. I thought this would be great. I could compete with my wife (always fun, because then we have great "I crushed you sex" later), and I could see how my daughter is progressing with her vocabulary.
Only - you can't. I'd have to go into my daughter's profile. Why not a "Compare Stats" on the main screen so you can see "words recognized/words learned/etc". And even if you wanted to know how well you're doing, you only get a little chart that shows a graph showing how many you got right.
So much potential. Developers and publishers whine about how nobody can compete with Nintendo on Nintendo products. Well, I'm sorry - I don't make games, and I could tell after 5 minutes of play why this game had so many user interface issues that I assumed it had to be made by Microsoft.
Ooo, harsh, I know.
Hilary Clinton: the Dumbest Thing Ever
Hilary Clinton Campaign:
In kindergarten, Senator Obama wrote an essay titled 'I Want to Become President.' "Iis Darmawan, 63, Senator Obama's kindergarten teacher, remembers him as an exceptionally tall and curly haired child who quickly picked up the local language and had sharp math skills. He wrote an essay titled, 'I Want To Become President,' the teacher said." [AP, 1/25/07 ]
Seriously. She's calling him dishonest because when he ws in kindergarten, he said he wanted to run for President some day.
OK - why don't I like Hilary again?
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Fire emblem oddity
The lovely red headed knight in full armor? I like that she's in full armor, not a chainmail bikini or something stupid.
But - her name's Titania?
Really?
Blogged with Flock
Debate Bummers
Blogged with Flock
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Two Articles on Guitar Hero III: One Message: Women, Leave the Stage
<a href="http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/29/you-really-got-me/">You Really Got Me</a> - which explains the hurt by one Guitar Hero female player about how the female characters changed from hard rockers to porn stars with guitars
Blogged with Flock
Justice in Iraq
Why? The US military can't say.
When is his trial? They can't say.
What's the evidence? They can't say.
I recently wrote an article about how Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney is a reminder of how being a defense attorney was a noble thing once upon a time, and how the universe in the game was warped into a perverted idea of the justice system, where prosecutorers can question the accused without their attorney, and hide evidence from the defense.
Evidently, for the US government operating in Iraq, that fiction is now a truth.
Source: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/23/AR2007112301208.html">Washington Post</a>
Blogged with Flock
Monday, November 26, 2007
Scumm. iPhone. Nerdgasm
Any guesses on what I'm about to install on my iPhone in about, oh, 30 seconds?
Blogged with Flock
Gunbuster!
The original. Not that terrible sequel. Which was too bad, because it could have been really good, and the "Woah! No wai!" moment was rather interesting.
But - Gunbuster.
*Sweet*
Blogged with Flock
Sunday, November 25, 2007
Oooo! Oooo!
Me: Hm.
Iron Chef: ...Tina Fey!
Me: Oooo! Oooooooo!
My Lovely Wife (MLW): (Eyebrow)
Me: I mean - oh, it's her. Ah - big deal.
MLW: That's what I thought.
Blogged with Flock
Saturday, November 24, 2007
True Conversations with my Daughter
Emily: What's that?
Me: It's a pillowcase. Look - it has Haruhi, and Mikaru, and Yuki on it in their sleepware! Maybe I should put it on my pillow.
Emily: Nuh-uh!
Me: Why not?
Emily: (Starts doing a "I'm teasing Daddy" dance.) Because Mommy won't let you have it, because she won't want you to sleep on pretty girls.
Me: Really. Why don't you go ask your mother then and see what she says.
Emily: OK! (Runs upstairs with the pillowcase.)
(2 minutes pass)
My Lovely Wife: No, he's not!
Emily: I told you!
Me: ...
Blogged with Flock
Thursday, November 22, 2007
Legally Blond. The musical.
Blogged with Flock
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Unexpected Family Moment
Me: Yup?
FiL: You can sell stuff on the Internet, right?
Me: Sure.
FiL: How much would you get for this Harry Potter book.
Me: (tap tap tap) About $4.
FiL: So you can really sell anything?
Me: Just about.
FiL: What about Playboy?
Me: Uh - what?
FiL: Playboy. They got Playboy on there.
Me: You want to sell Playboy.
FiL: Yup. Got a bunch of old ones.
Me: Uh - sure.
Blogged with Flock
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
I found the last copy of Rock Band in town
I bought it.
Now it's on eBay.
Yes, I'm evil.
Blogged with Flock
Monday, November 19, 2007
YS I & II Wii bound?
My understanding is that the game had a translation on that platform (the PC version only has a fan translation), so this is actually possible. I never played it, but heard good things, so this could be my chance.
Blogged with Flock
Best justification for torture ever!
There are some who claim that torture is a nonissue because it never works--it only produces false information. This is simply not true, as evidenced by the many decent members of the French Resistance who, under Nazi torture, disclosed the locations of their closest friends and relatives.
Source: ALAN DERSHOWITZ, The Wall Street Journal
Need I say more?
Blogged with Flock
Congress fails to pass $50 billion war bill
Yes, I say good. Right now, we're funding a war, and a government, purely off of credit. So let's let the Pentagon decide which is really important to them - and use the money they have for a change.
Blogged with Flock
Friday, November 16, 2007
Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles coming!
Sweetness.
Blogged with Flock
School, and feeling like the worst father in the world
Recently they changed his teacher and class around for some reason or another. Then they changed his bus route (so we've been taking the kids, since getting to school 45 minutes early is silly), and for some reason, this is giving him problems. When it's time to go to school, he doesn't want to go, he "forgets" things, and nearly has to be dragged from the car by a teacher and taken to class.
I've been understanding, but the other day I layed down the law: if I heard from his mother that he didn't go to school properly, he would get spanked. We set the terms, he understood them.
Yesterday, I came home. And learned that he had been difficult in going to school.
So I asked him if he remembered what I said I was going to do. He said he did, big tears in his big hazel eyes. I bent him over, and hit him on the butt once.
I knew I had to do it. I had set the terms, and he had to get his punishment. Today, it seems like we're not having any problems getting to school.
I still feel rotten. And I'd do it again, if I could go back in time.
Blogged with Flock
Thursday, November 15, 2007
This might be the dumbest thing in a review I've ever seen
Getting right into those issues, at the time of this writing we're unable to play the game for more than a few seconds at a time without it crashing back to the desktop, and, as evidenced by posts in various forums, we're not alone. The problem halted our progress after around 10 hours, but can purportedly do the same thing at almost any time. This appears to be a compatibility issue similar to that in the PC version of Gears of War, which, not coincidentally, incorporates the same Xbox Live-like "Games for Windows Live" service. Refusing to log in to said service will let you work on your Viva Piñata garden in most cases, but it'll also deprive you of the option to save your progress. These issues don't rob the game of its charm, but they do make the overall experience rather frustrating if you happen to run into them.
OK. Hold on. It doesn't run for more than a few seconds, unless you don't log in - but then you can't save.
And the game gets a 7.5.
What the hell?
Blogged with Flock
Why is Bush and Co fighting so hard for telco immunity?
Why is Bush and Co fighting so hard for this immunity?
Because they know what they did was wrong. If they did not break the law - as they keep saying, then this immunity would not be needed. But, if they *did* violate the law by using wiretaps and requesting other FISA information (information that they could have requested through a secret court, 72 hours *after* they started, so the claim of "Oh, we needed this information and couldn't wait for the slow courts" is a load of shit).
Bush and Co know that if the telco's are held to account for violating FISA, it's only a matter of time before the telco's start ratting out the Bush administration, pointing at them and saying "They - they made us do it! We had no choice in the matter!" And with only 12 months before a possible change from Republican to Democrat, they have to act *now* to get the telcos their immunity.
Otherwise, they'll be finding themselves right in the cross hairs, and possibly even in jail. Sadly, as my teacher used to say, the chickens always come home to roost. After ignoring the laws of the land for several years, I think the Bush administration chicken hawks are going to get what's coming to them. Justice may be slow and blind - but she is one determined bitch.
Blogged with Flock
Zak and Wiki thoughts: Why isn't it selling?
Look at the latter. I only know about it because I follow the gaming media.
The game is sheer awesome. I've been avoiding even looking at gaming faqs, because so much of the fun is going "OK, so I have an umbrella, and a shovel, and - oh, wait! I got it!"
You fail, but every level can be restarted, and once you figure it out, you can blaze right through.
But - the marketing. The name. The look. I keep comparing this game to Ico. In Ico (and it's "sequel", "Shadow fo the Colossus", everything you needed so solve an area's puzzle was right there in the room with you. You didn't have to go back and forth across the map to solve the puzzle. But the look is very mature, very cool, and sold rather well.
I can't help but wonder what if Capcom didn't look at the Wii as "the kid and family friendly device", and designed Zak and Wiki with that in mind. You could have the same story-line, without the cartoon cell shaded graphics and wacky cartoon physics. The games play and mental puzzles are *far* above that of a child - perhaps a teenager and up, at least, so the childishness was really not needed.
Don't get me wrong - I like the look, and my children are enjoying playing it with me (well, I play, they point their Wiimotes on the screen and draw lines and shout suggestions that usually don't work - but I walk them through my thinking process). But I can't help but wonder if the game wouldn't have sold more if it had, and God forgive me for saying this, a more "mature" look and feel.
Blogged with Flock
I'm thinking about getting this for my son for Christmas
Blogged with Flock
Guitar Hero III for the Wii: What I want to see
A $30 Wii version of GHIII that includes the music from GH1, 2, and Rock the 80's.
Thank you.
Blogged with Flock
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
In which I almost kill a bank teller
Teller: OK! Hey, while you're here, would you like to fill out this credit card application?
Me: I'd rather have my tongue ripped from my mouth, stapled to my forehead, and asked to drink a glass of pure lemon juice.
Teller: That's sounds painful.
Me: That's the point.
Teller: But you know - Christmas is coming! With this, you could get your presents and pay no interest!
Me: I've spent the last 4 years eradicating every credit card from my life. I am down to 1. I am not adding any more.
Teller: But -
Me: *GLARE!* *EYEBROW!*
Teller: ...
Blogged with Flock
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Mario Galaxy: Why I totally Suck
I actually went twice. First at 11:30, where I was told they'd have the game there at 1700. OK - so I left work at 1600, got to the Toys R Us at 1430, and saw a line.
I picked up one of the "Display Only - Bring to Register to purchase!"
And man - was I just in time.
Turns out they only had - 3. If you didn't reserve it (which nobody in the line did). And then, there were the couple in front of me (grandma and grandpa) who each bought one, after arguing for 10 minutes that the advertisement didn't say "One per household", just "one per person", so they each bought one.
Which mean - I got the last one in the store.
Luckily, the other 20 grown ups didn't lynch me on the way out (though it was a close thing). Now, My Lovely Wife tells me I can't play it until Christmas morning with the kids.
Yeah. I'm waiting until she goes to sleep. I mean, I have to verify it works, right?
Blogged with Flock
Sunday, November 11, 2007
I wouldn't know what to do, honest!
Me: I hate this commercial. What kind of a make out technique is this? "I'm so stupid I ran out of gas - make out with me?"
My Lovely Wife(MLW): I hate this commercial because her laugh is clearly fake.
Me: Well, I just hate his make out technique. I mean, if I was going to do it - well, I wouldn't know what to do, because before I met you, I was totally innocent before you seduced me and put your tongue in my mouth.
MLW: (Singing voice) You're going to Hell, for being a li-ar.
Me: ....
Blogged with Flock
Saturday, November 10, 2007
Guitar Hero III on the Wii
I can confirm the Wii version is better than the PS3 version - the guitar is working perfectly, star power works like it should, it is *very* responsive, and I think the keys actually feel better.
Funny that one console version of the hardware should feel so much better, but there you have it. Once I find a box big enough, I'll fill out the paperwork and return the PS3 version back to Amazon come Tuesday. Too bad.
I'm going to go cancel my Rock Band purchase as well and hope they come out with a Wii version soon.
Friday, November 09, 2007
Black Friday Deal: Get a Free GH2 With Xbox 360
Hmmmm....
http://kotaku.com/gaming/retail/black-friday-deal-get-a-free-gh2-with-xbox-360-321161.php
Sent from my iPhone
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Guitar Hero III slowdown
Man - I am *so* going to return this in another week if there's no patch. This is just getting ridiculous.
Blogged with Flock
Thursday, November 08, 2007
Date rape drug in toys
Well, not any more, I guess.
Whatever happened to consumer safety laws? Did I miss something and they all get thrown out?
Money where the mouth is
We'll spend billions in the war on Iraq - but a pittance of that number taking care of our veterans. We'll give them a gun, and when they come home we tell them they don't have mental issues and kick them onto the curb.
What is wrong with us as a nation? Spending the equivalent of 40 days in Iraq on health care for children is "too much". Spending enough money and time and energy to ensure that our veterans hospitals have all of the support they need to serve the veterans is just too big of a burden.
There is something seriously wrong with us as a nation. And I don't know how to fix it.
Wednesday, November 07, 2007
That's it. I'm done with Digg Shouts
So - new rule: You shout at me for anything other than a real message like "Hey, I read your comment on X and had this thought I wanted to take offline", then you're off the friend list.
Energy costs based on carbon emissions?
It's an interesting idea, and it takes into account the total cost of the production of these items (aka - on the environment and pollution), rather than just the cost shipping and extracting them. It's the equivalent of going after a chemical company that dumps stuff in the local water - since they have to pay for the cost of cleaning up their mess, they're more likely to take care in how much they pollute.
Source: New York Times.
Pat Robertson on Giuliani: Reading between the lines
So, now that I have Mr. Robertson's quote in my hands, let's go over it and read between the lines.
“It is my pleasure to announce my support for America’s Mayor, Rudy Giuliani, a proven leader who is not afraid of what lies ahead and who will cast a hopeful vision for all Americans,” Pat Robertson said in a statement issued by the Giuliani campaign.
Translation: I had a chat with him, and he agreed that as President he'd still give my organizations money. And, he'd say he hates Muslims and gays every so often.
“Rudy Giuliani took a city that was in decline and considered ungovernable and reduced its violent crime, revitalized its core, dramatically lowered its taxes, cut through a welter of bureaucratic regulations, and did so in the spirit of bipartisanship which is so urgently needed in Washington today.”
Translation: I know that Jesus talked about helping the homeless, the poor, the sick and the needy - but fuck that shit! Damn it, I needs my tax cut so I can afford another really big house, and I can't do it if a leader actually does what Jesus said to do! So if cutting some "bureaucracy" means some guy on the corner can get shipped to California where those filthy Hollywood heathens can deal with them, fine by me!
Bhutto: What to do?
So - what can I do? Will anything I write or say encourage President Bush to tell Musharraf "Either you get your act together, or you lose all of the funding we sent you?" Can we get Bush to have the balls to do what Clinton did to Milosevic, and make life so miserable through strategic bombings that kill power so that the people rise up against him?
I don't know. But I find it sad that we went into Afghanistan with noble ideals: get the terrorists who attacked us for 9-11, and along the way wound up invading and occupying the wrong country so we could "give them democracy", and supported a dictator who removed an elected leader for the same reasons.
Seriously. What sense does *any* of this make?
Source: New York Times
My Mother's Big Brain Stupid Wii Halo Advertising
At the same time, there's another show called "Big Bang Theory", featuring 5 twenty-somethings living - I think New York. Anyway, that show has 4 MIT multiple degree supergeniuses living across the hall from a Hot Girl, and crazy antics ensue.
On a recent "How I Met Your Mother", the attractive witty people were playing Wii Sports, getting so far into it that Marshall decided he had to play "Wimbleton Style" and strip to his boxers.
On "Big Bang Theory", the smart guys were freaking out because they couldn't play "Halo 3", and later on, they interrupted one of their friend's sexual play so they could have a full team, and still later, when Hot Girl's friends came over offering them all sex, they ignored them to keep playing Halo 3.
So, America, which would you want to be - the good looking people playing the Wii, or the ubergeeks playing "Halo 3"? The sexy people who strip to their boxers playing the Wii, or the guys who turn down sex with hot girls?
What's odd is that "Big Bang Theory" is on NBC, which is a partner with Microsoft. If you wanted a worse commercial for the Xbox 360, I can't think of one right there. Now, if they had the geeks participating in a tournament and they needed Hot Girl's help to win, then the drama and excitement could have been cool.
Update: My Lovely Wife (MLW) told me that "Big Bang Theory" is on CBS, while "How I Met Your Mother" is on CBS as well. So, I guess if you're going to conspiracy theory things, then CBS is trying to make MSNBC look bad. Or - something.
Blogged with Flock
Tuesday, November 06, 2007
The worst thing about being Superman
Think about it. You're Superman. You can fly around the world in
seconds. But when you travel for a reporting assignment, you're stuck
in coach.
So you sit in a little seat for hours, all to keep your secret
identity intact. Bet that would suck.
Sent from my iPhone
Monday, November 05, 2007
Suicide Bombers in - Halo 3?
Over at Wired
Blogged with Flock
Fatal Frame - the card game
Fatal Frame II the Card Game.
Blogged with Flock
Sunday, November 04, 2007
[ HuffingtonPost.com ] Recommendation: Gap Kids: New Frontiers in Child Abuse
I'm not sure this will work, but I'm going to forward this link on child labor from my phone.
Barbara Ehrenreich: Gap Kids: New Frontiers in Child Abuse
Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barbara-ehrenreich/gap-kids-new-frontiers-i_b_70638.html
Saturday, November 03, 2007
Phoenix Wright 3 note
I'm sorry but - it's cute. Not as good as when Mia takes over Maya's body and the hawt comes in, but - orange waitress outfit is still cute.
Edit: Turns out there was a big surprise in stock for me, one that made me laugh out loud. Mia is *still* the queen.
Blogged with Flock
Guitar Hero III good and bad
Until it comes to Star Power. Then, the guitar either completely ignores me holding the guitar straight up, or the slightest movement activates the Star Power.
Blogged with Flock
Friday, November 02, 2007
I have met Jean Armstrong
sleeveless chef's uniform who likes to swing his arms and shoe off his
swollen belly.
...
I am visually scarred for life.
Sent from my iPhone
88 percent believed in slavery. Except when they didn't.
Add to this that several of the state department diplomats didn't know they'd have the possibility of serving until they read about it in the Washington Post, and you can imagine they're a little put off.
Then, we get this moment.
Thomas took full responsibility for the late notification but objected when AFSA President John Naland said a recent survey found only 12 percent of the union's membership believed Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was ``fighting for them.''
``That's their right but they're wrong,'' Thomas said, prompting a testy exchange.
``Sometimes, if it's 88 to 12, maybe the 88 percent are correct,'' Naland said.
``88 percent of the country believed in slavery at one time, was that correct?'' shot back Thomas, who is black, in a remark that drew boos from the crowd. ``Don't you or anybody else stand there and tell me I don't care about my colleagues. I am insulted,'' Thomas added.
So, let's ignore that basically, this gentleman was equating that not wanting to go to a dangerous area of the world, where there are people actively kidnapping, beheading, and blowing up Americans becuase they really, *really* don't want us there - evidently, that viewpoint of not wanting to get blowed up is the same thing as slavery.
Hey, why not.
But did 88% of the country really believe in slavery? Let me just think off the top of my head. 50% of the country was made of "free states", 50% of the country was made of "slave states".
Most of the population has always been in the northern states, so let's pretend that the ratio was 65% of the population living in Free States, 45% in the Slave States.
Then, you have to figure that there were a lot of slaves in the south. Probably as many as there were white people, possibly more, but let's pretend about the same. So now you've got the south, which is 50% white, 50% slaves.
I think I can make a safe assumption that slaves didn't really *believe* in slavery, as much as slavery believed in them.
So, now we've got 50% of 45%, which is 22.5% of the population which, up until the civil war, believed in slavery as a "good principle". Which means that only 22.5% of the population once believed in slavery.
Which is still lower than George Bush's 25% approval rating today.
Blogged with Flock
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Timeshift notes
I caught the mini-documentary over at Gametrailers, and it looks like the original title had some really cool features. It was going to tell the story of a father who's young daughter had been lost because of changes he made while time traveling. Evidently, changes which also caused the world to shift to one based on steampunk technology. So he has to go set things right.
As a dad, I thought this was a pretty cool idea, and the steampunk element was certainly unique.
But - I guess Sierra wanted something "easier" they could put into a franchise. So now, you are a nameless, mute hero that you never see (kind of like Half-Life), living in a dystopian future (kind of like Half-Life 2) where you have cool time travel powers, but you don't know what the heck is up with the story or why things or happening until you get closer to the end (kind of like - well, you get it).
I saw the original bits they were going to do, and I'm disappointed. They had a cool, original idea with a story that had some emotional impact. Looking at the "new" look and story feel, I can't help but feel like they gave up something great, in exchange for something more ordinary.
Guess I'll find out in a couple of months - or whenever I get around to renting it.
Why hold open trials
This response rather reminds me of when the Philippians prosecuted their terrorists a few years ago.
Using the court system brings the issues to light. It tells people - openly, without fear or prejudice, "This is how these criminals work". Now, all people can see what to avoid.
It brings the arguments and plans of these groups into the open, rather than keeping them in the shadows. Instead of mysterious, unknown reasons other than "They hate our freedoms", their grievances are now part of the public record, and shown where they are faulty in the eyes of the law and the community at large.
This prevents would-be terrorists from recruiting others based on ignorance. It's no longer "The evil infidels/imperials/etc are keeping us down because they hate us" - they lost that argument when the full use of an open court system is used. Then, they are shown that they are "kept down" because they conspire to kill innocent people for their own selfish reasons of power.
It also keeps the government in check - if the government is itself performing actions that are not in keeping with an open and just society, then it will be forced to expose this as well, which means that people can make positive changes *without* resorting to violence and terror.
And finally, the open court system has the same result as "secret renditions and using enemy combatant" techniques does - it puts terrorists and their supporters in jail, or in the execution chamber should the laws of that society demand it. Not in secret, not by violating people's civil rights, but by *using* those rights and legal powers - even on those we would despise the most.
That is what using an open court system does when applied to terrorists. And why the United States should be doing the same.
60 MPG Hummer. With jet engine.
ABA Death Penalty Stay
This was followed by the Supreme Court giving a halt to some executions until they sort out the lethal injection issue, and whether it's "cruel and unusual".
I noticed that in both cases, they weren't saying that the death penalty in and of itself is wrong - but there's a problem with how it is carried out.
In the ABA's case, they focused on the process. And the statistics. The ABA took a look at things and went "Hm - if you're black, you're more likely to get the death penalty. And if you're black and the victim is white, then you're *really* in trouble, because people seem to think that killing a white person by a black person is more deserving of death than if you kill - well, anybody else."
Compound that with poor people getting more death sentences than rich people, and after awhile, it becomes clear that justice isn't blind - but the scales are being rigged with coins.
A month ago when I was traveling from DC, I was listening to an episode of "Tech Nation" that discussed prison issues in America. The person doing the study was British, and he found an interesting thing. The United States is going through the exact same thinking that the British did about a hundred years ago with prisons.
In the late 1800's and the early 1900's, the British thought they had it figured out as far as prisoners. You punish them - hard. Make their lives a living hell. Are they in debt? Well, then you put them into jail until they could pay their way out, and if they couldn't, then it would take them longer to learn their lesson! While in jail, give them the most menial tasks. In some cases, literally just sitting around breaking rocks, to remind them of how awful the experience was. The goal was to make prison life so unbearable, that upon getting out the criminal would decide never to go back. They would have been Punished, and thereby would learn.
The problem, they discovered, is that the prisoners would get out of jail even worse than before. They would go on to be even worse criminals.
So, the British system changed, and stopped being about punishment, and about reform. Eventually, things got better. Crime dropped. It's no paradise - but it certainly lead to a better system than they had before.
Now, America is in the same place. During the 1970's Perry Mason was The Lawyer to watch on TV. Now, Law and Order dominates three different shows, showing how those nasty, slimy defense attorneys do everything to protect their obviously guilty clients. We have supermax prisons where inmates get no TV, no time together, treated as little more than dangerous animals.
Sure - prisoners are bad people. But - where are the efforts to change them? Why are our new prison complexes being supported now by huge businesses which have no vested interest in getting prisoners to stop committing crimes?
Think about the latter for a second. If you're a business who builds, owns, and runs a prison - why would you want prisoners to ever leave, or leave and never come back? That's only going to ruin your business!
I don't want prisoners coddled. I don't want the death penalty to change. But - I do want some changes:
1. Changes in trials. I've been thinking about this one for some time, and I'm not sure on how it would be implemented. But I go back to a story in "Freakanomics", where the classical music industry changed so that judges would not be allowed to see prospective players, only listen to their music. This simple change lead to the "knowledge" that women could not play instruments as well as men being changed, and today the ratio between professional men and women in orchestras is nearly 50/50.
Juries look at a person in a bench, and from the ABA's discovery, race clearly plays an issue. They see a black person, a white victim, and death is more likely. I can't help but wonder what would happen if the jury could not see the victim, or the defendant? I know - this is just as impractical. They have to see the evidence. If there's a video tape of the crime, they have to see it.
I don't know how to solve this. Perhaps forcing a jury to be more racially mixed (kind of an affirmative action for jury pools?). I don't know the answer to this one - but clearly the system has to change.
2. Reform, not punishment. I can't say that one enough. Our prisons are *not* about reform. Yes, you need good security to protect inmates and guards. But I also want to see more education. Every prisoners should be exiting with at least a high school education, and hopefully a trade. They should be moved away from their home town so they are away from the influences that "caused them to stray". Post care should be given - not just probation follow ups, but real care, to make sure they are housed and clothed and healthy and working.
Remove any excuses for blaming it on bad home life. Daily therapy at prison so there's no reason why a prisoner won't know why they are being punished, why committing crimes is "bad". Follow up therapy to make sure they're remaining productive.
3. Give the death penalty only when they can not be taught. If a person gets all of the breaks I outline above, then - and only then - can we enforce the death penalty, because then a prisoner will have proven to us that they can not (or will not) be taught how to function in society.
It will be expensive, but I'm willing to bet if we do it right the first time, we'll reduce crime over the long term, and that will save us more money than just building more prisons.
Now the question is: what next?
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Boycott the version of Manhunt 2 you can not buy!
Mainly, they want people to boycott the version that they downloaded off of the Internet that is the "uncensored version", which you can not buy in stores. The version is stores was "toned down" so it could meet the "M for Mature" rating from the ESRB.
What I find interesting is that they are admitting they are going to be showing information from a version of the game they downloaded.
Which, unless I am mistaken, is a violation of copyright law.
Which, unless I am mistaken, means you could call the Business Software Alliance to perform an investigation of this organization who is illegally pirating software, which is punishable with jail time and a find of around $50,000 per violation found.
So, a law breaking organization wishes to institute a boycott against a version of a game that can only be obtained illegally. Interesting.
No Google IMAP for me
Castlevania X disappointments
2. Castlevania: Symphony of the Night takes *forever* to load once you've unlocked it. And it's not completely widescreen - just zoomed in a little! Sure, it looks great - but so did running it as a PSX on PSP emulated game (instructions at Gamers' Press on how to do that). And, if you emulate it, you can change your control scheme on the fly, get complete screen fillage (even if it is a bit stretched, it still looks pretty good).
You lost some points here, Capcom. I'm a little disappointed.
"Disgaea: Afternoon of Darkness", though? Pure awesome. I never finished the original - I don't think I got past Chapter III, so I think I can finish it this time.
Monday, October 29, 2007
Prices
Withdrawing $20 from an atm: Free if scary at night
Milk, Corn Pops, bowl, spoon: $12
Not paying hotel price for breakfast so I get to keep $15 a day extra to put into my pocket: pricess
This is what they serve in airports
Sent from my iPhone